England vs Pakistan

Pakistan 1st innings

Total
157 all out, from 19.5 overs.

Batting

Muhammad Rizwan
b Rashid;
23 runs,
16 balls,
3 fours,
0 sixes,
and a strike rate of 143.75

Babar Azam (c)
c Rashid b Archer;
36 runs,
22 balls,
5 fours,
1 sixes,
and a strike rate of 163.64

Usman Khan
c Jordan b Livingstone;
38 runs,
21 balls,
3 fours,
2 sixes,
and a strike rate of 180.95

Fakhar Zaman
c Rashid b Ali;
9 runs,
9 balls,
0 fours,
1 sixes,
and a strike rate of 100.00

Shadab Khan
b Rashid;
0 runs,
1 balls,
0 fours,
0 sixes,
and a strike rate of 0.00

Azam Khan (wk)
c Buttler b Wood;
0 runs,
5 balls,
0 fours,
0 sixes,
and a strike rate of 0.00

Iftikhar Ahmed
c Brook b Jordan;
21 runs,
18 balls,
2 fours,
0 sixes,
and a strike rate of 116.67

Shaheen Shah Afridi
b Livingstone;
0 runs,
2 balls,
0 fours,
0 sixes,
and a strike rate of 0.00

Naseem Shah
c Buttler b Wood;
16 runs,
18 balls,
1 fours,
1 sixes,
and a strike rate of 88.89

Mohammad Amir
not out;
0 runs,
0 balls,
0 fours,
0 sixes,
and a strike rate of 0.00

Haris Rauf
run out;
8 runs,
7 balls,
1 fours,
0 sixes,
and a strike rate of 114.29

Yet to bat

Fall of Wickets

Babar Azam at 59 for 1, from 5.6 overs
Muhammad Rizwan at 65 for 2, from 6.4 overs
Fakhar Zaman at 83 for 3, from 8.6 overs
Shadab Khan at 84 for 4, from 9.2 overs
Azam Khan at 86 for 5, from 10.2 overs
Usman Khan at 126 for 6, from 14.1 overs
Shaheen Shah Afridi at 126 for 7, from 14.3 overs
Iftikhar Ahmed at 145 for 8, from 17.6 overs
Naseem Shah at 149 for 9, from 18.4 overs
Haris Rauf at 157 for 10, from 19.5 overs

Bowling

Wood:
4overs,
0 maidens,
35 runs,
2 wickets,
and an economy of 8.75.

Archer:
3.5overs,
0 maidens,
31 runs,
1 wickets,
and an economy of 8.08.

Jordan:
3overs,
0 maidens,
24 runs,
1 wickets,
and an economy of 8.00.

Ali:
2overs,
0 maidens,
23 runs,
1 wickets,
and an economy of 11.50.

Rashid:
4overs,
0 maidens,
27 runs,
2 wickets,
and an economy of 6.75.

Livingstone:
3overs,
1 maidens,
17 runs,
2 wickets,
and an economy of 5.66.

Reviews

90 %

User Score

2 ratings
Rate This

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *