LeBron James Shocked Pacers Didn’t Foul Celtics’ Jaylen Brown Before Game-Tying 3
Timothy Rapp@@TRappaRTFeatured Columnist IVMay 22, 2024
Nathaniel S. Butler/NBAE via Getty Images
The Indiana Pacers blew a lead against the Boston Celtics in the final seconds of the fourth quarter during Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals, as Jaylen Brown’s game-tying three with 5.7 seconds remaining forced overtime.
NBA @NBAJAYLEN BROWN TIES THE GAME AT 117!
5 SECONDS REMAINING IN GAME 1 ON ESPN #NBAConferenceFinals presented by Google Pixel pic.twitter.com/QS6b3v8Kjy
The Celtics ultimately won in overtime 133-128.
And LeBron James was wondering why the Pacers—or any other team in a similar situation, for that matter—didn’t simply foul:
LeBron James @KingJamesAnd yall still wanna know why I would foul up 3 EVERY SINGLE TIME?? 🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️
He wasn’t alone:
Seth Davis @SethDavisHoopsFoul up three people https://t.co/0vQZd4G5gs
Mike Wise @MikeWiseguyI can’t watch the Pacers throw this away. 8.5 sec. left in reg., Pacers up 3 with ball. No one comes to the ball on out of bounds play! TO. Then they guard the paint like they’re up 1. Jaylen Brown makes a crazy 3 to force OT. Even if you don’t foul, guard the damn 3-point line!
Clarence Hill Jr @clarencehilljrit was but you are still up three…foul https://t.co/opp8U879iN
Chris Vernon @ChrisVernonShowwhat a gack by pacers. just have to get ball in bounds. just have foul up 3. yeesh. all went wrong.
Adam Schein @AdamScheinInbounds. Not fouling. P hands not up. Haliburton awful possession. How the hell do you not foul up 3.
The logic for fouling up three is simple—yes, you potentially give up two free points at the charity stripe, but you keep the trailing team from immediately tying. The leading team then needs to not turn the ball over on any ensuing inbounds plays and hit its free throws, but if it does, the “fouling up three” strategy squeezes the clock until eventually the trailing team doesn’t have enough time to get a good look at a game-tying three.
The argument against fouling up three is risking a shooting foul, potentially giving up a four-point play—or three attempts from the charity stripe, a far easier form of tying the game than a contested three-pointer—in the process.
There’s also the factor of needing to successfully inbound the ball and hit your free throws in the possessions to follow. Some coaches would prefer to play tight defense and force a tough attempt on a contested three instead of extending the game and risking their team making a mistake that would give the trailing team a chance to win on a two.
On Tuesday, however, the Pacers’ misstep certainly offered a strong argument in favor of fouling up three.
