Rupert Friend Wants a Berlin Do-Over

Rupert Friend is heading into the Berlinale a little anxious.

The British actor, a veteran of the industry with major roles in Homeland, Pride & Prejudice and, most recently, Drew Hancock’s buzzy thriller Companion, was only a “whip of a thing” when ChĂ©ri premiered in competition at the 2009 Berlin Film Festival.

“I was 25 and it was probably my first big lead role,” the now-43-year-old tells The Hollywood Reporter. “From the first 20 seconds, you just felt the audience
 lean back. The movie finished and it was the sound of one, slow clap. I just died.”

After this “bombing” of Stephen Frears’ Colette adaptation, Friend was a little wary of the spotlight. It impacted him for a long time after, he confesses, even though he landed the part of a key character in the wildly successful Showtime series Homeland shortly after.

It’s only right that Friend returns to Berlin with a vengeance: not one, but two of his films are premiering in the German capital this year. In the first, Dreams, Friend stars as Jake in Mexican filmmaker Michel Franco‘s latest drama. He is the brother of Jessica Chastain‘s Jennifer — the two are wealthy socialites in San Francisco who, under the wing of their powerful father, are generous donors to the arts. When Jennifer begins a passionate love affair with a younger, undocumented Mexican ballet dancer, she is forced to make decisions about his future in order to keep the relationship from damaging her pristine reputation.

“I don’t want to put words in Jessica’s mouth, but she was very keen that the audience not like her character,” Friend teases of the film’s protagonist. “The entitlement was the thing that I really lent into
 This feeling that the world is just there waiting for you.”

In Lucio Castro’s After This Death, screening later in Berlin, Friend does a complete 180: He is Ted, the cuckolded husband of Mía Maestro who has become obsessed with an underground musician (Lee Pace). “It was just the opposite of Jake: someone who’s trying to live a good life and love his wife.”

The actor opened up to THR about reclaiming his Berlin Film Festival experience, finding intimacy in playing Jessica Chastain’s sibling and and why he prefers life away from the “razzmatazz.”

Have you been to Berlin before?

Yeah, a million years ago, a film I made with Stephen Frears called Chéri (2009) opened the festival. [It was] with Michelle Pfeiffer and Kathy Bates. I was a whip of a thing.

How was that?

It was very difficult for me, to be honest, because I’m not someone who naturally gravitates towards the whole crowds and razzmatazz thing, and it was a big deal with a big movie star [Pfeiffer]. Except I was playing the titular character, and the movie pretty much bombed. I was 25 and it was probably my first big lead role. I was sitting in the front row of the film. But I was in every frame, and from the first 20 seconds, you just felt the audience
 lean back. The movie finished and it was the sound of one, slow clap. I just died.

Everyone was very sweet about it, and said, “Listen, there’s a million reasons why a film doesn’t work, and it’s never one thing, and certainly wasn’t your fault.” All the things people would say to a young actor at the beginning of their career. Stephen was incredibly gracious, because I’m sure it wasn’t easy for him, but I’ll never forget, we went for Vienna schnitzel afterward, all of us — which I think was supposed to be a celebratory meal, and it ended up being quite the opposite — and he quoted to me from the Rudyard Kipling poem If—. It’s something like, “If you can meet with disaster and triumph and treat these two imposters just the same, then you will be a man.” Stephen was saying to me that if this film had won 20 Oscars, you can’t let that change you. And if it tanks, neither can you let that change you. It was a very profound piece of advice. But I think [the experience] was probably quite pivotal for me, because I think it made me want to hide from showing the work and just hide in the characters and the work itself.

Pfeiffer and Friend in Stephen Frears’ ‘ChĂ©ri.’

Everett

How long do you think that impacted you — both professionally and personally?

Well, my life went through a huge change shortly after that, whether by design or not, I don’t know. I took what I didn’t know was going to be a huge commitment to a television show called Homeland
 It really was just an episode, maybe two, and I had to go through quite a lot of personal upheaval — leave Britain and everything I knew to take this character from a very peripheral day player to the second lead over the course of five years. [I had to] move to America, meet my wife. These things were fairly seminal and I think had to happen before I was able to maybe find an ease with returning to potentially standing in front of my work. I’ve always, frankly, rather to just do the work, and I would rather most of the time not even see it. I’ve not seen most of the things I’ve done and I don’t know how much of that is to do with that experience at the [Berlin Film] Festival.

Is it fair to say you don’t associate Berlin with fond memories?

If you mean the festival, rather than the city
 It’s 15 years later. Maybe it’s an opportunity to rewrite the story of that festival because I actually love cinema, I love filmmakers and everyone involved with film, and really these festivals are just a celebration of that. But I wonder whether it was slightly once bitten, twice shy about playing lead roles for a while. I was more interested in supporting [roles] so that it was less spotlight.

[The spotlight] has never been an easy thing.

Let’s talk about Dreams as it will be premiering first. I’m curious how you got involved. Had you worked with Michel Franco before?

I haven’t seen the film yet! But Michel Franco is such an original voice in cinema. I’d been a fan from the audience side of things — the film he did with Tim Roth, Sundown (2021), it was amazing. I don’t know that I’d even ever allowed myself to think someone like that would pick me. So when the call came that Michel wants you to play this role, and not only that, but you’re going to be Jessica [Chastain]’s brother. I slightly didn’t believe it at first.

It’s something I really admire in auteurs. They have this unwavering conviction about what they’re doing, and I think it comes from an incredible degree of confidence. They don’t need everyone to like it. That’s another thing that’s somehow superhuman — I think most of us humans are quite keen for people to like what we do and to like us. It’s one of the human conditions, why we’re a tribal species. But I almost think great artists have a superpower, which is that their confidence isn’t shaken by someone reading a script of theirs and saying, “I don’t like it,” or the film failing, quote, unquote. One of the things about Michel’s films is — they’re not prescriptive. I feel like people can and should take very different readings from their respective viewings. I don’t think they’re designed to be one size fits all.

How would you describe the plot of Dreams and maybe summarize Jake’s part to play?

America, as a nation, doesn’t deal with class in the same way that certainly antiquated Britain used to. It definitely explores what’s possible for two people from two completely different backgrounds — one of whom is directly or indirectly benefiting the other. Jessica’s character and her family are very wealthy, and they are benefactors of the arts. And Jessica’s character begins a relationship with Isaac’s character who is a ballet dancer. But she tries to sequester it, tries to suppress it, and is ashamed of it. It brings not just ideas of class, but power in the sexual dynamic and that abuse of power. Can you ever actually have an equitable relationship with somebody if you have the power of their employment, their financial stability, their geographic location, their documents and papers?

I remember with Jessica, we were in Mexico City, and we were doing the very end of the movie where Jake, my character, Jessica’s brother, comes to rescue her and take her away back to the life of privilege and shelter and security that she’s always known. He puts an end, effectively, to what has become quite a dangerous dalliance. I don’t want to put words in Jessica’s mouth, but she was very keen that the audience not like her character and not think that this was some sort of exoneration — that the whole character of Mexico, which is a character in this film, be seen in some way as bad and the wealthy, blue blood San Franciscan family be seen as righteous.

Was Michel ever vocal about what kind of social or political commentary he was making when it comes to immigrant dreams of life in America? It’s extremely topical with what’s happening in the States right now.

Yeah. Obviously we weren’t in [the Trump] administration when we made the film, but Michel is a very softly-spoken, thoughtful but instinctual director. He’s wildly intelligent. But he doesn’t direct from a cerebral place. He directs the way all great directors do, which is understanding the truth of why the characters do what they do, rather than a doctrine from an academic or third-party standpoint on what it might mean on a broader scale.

I think he would say that those conversations [about a commentary on the current political scenario between America and Mexico] are what the art is spurring. They’re not what the art is answering. The movies that stay with me are the ones where the conversation has begun as the credits roll.

What kind of background-building did you do for Jake? We see glimpses of this powerful, nuclear family set-up they have. But Jake is snobbish towards Fernando — maybe that’s not the right word


It’s a tricky thing because I found things like the way he spoke to Fernando utterly repellent. So trying to not judge a character that you inherently dislike is one of the challenges of playing them. If all the characters in all the films weren’t good guys, we wouldn’t have any drama, right? So one of the challenges with a role that you don’t empathize with at all is to not judge the character and try and understand it from their point of view. Snobbish is definitely a word, but I think the entitlement was the thing that I really lent into this. This feeling that the world is just there waiting for you, that all doors will be opened whether by familial connections or just backhanded money deals. We’ve seen that time and time again in relatively recent exposĂ©s to do with power dynamics. #MeToo comes to mind. But also just bullies being exposed. I’ve been interested in bullying since I was a little boy, because I was very badly bullied. It’s normally picking on a physical characteristic, or your name or your culture or whatever. It’s pretty basic, but it’s very damaging. Kids can be pretty awful about it, but what’s kind of terrifying is people grow to be adults, and therefore, we hope, slightly more nuanced than playground children.

But the bullying doesn’t necessarily go away. It refines itself. It evolves like a very clever organism to manifest in far more subtle ways. We see it with — mentioning no names — politicians who don’t pay their workers and duck out from under those obligations or shame people with NDAs into not owning their truth and not being able to move forward with their lives. And I think for someone like Jake, because he likes to be thought of as a great guy, an upstanding member of the community, a big donor — again, money is often the root of a lot of these power plays — it means that everything is on his terms.

How was it working with Jessica and playing out that brother-sister dynamic?

One of the things I really was excited about with this, aside from everything we’ve already spoken about, is that fraternal relationship. Normally, you have a guy and a gal, they are probably supposed to fall in love, or have been in love or are breaking up. So, to get to have the intimacy that siblings have — all of the history, you know? Siblings can look at each other and remember all the fights and how annoyed they are with each other and how they can’t stand each other, but they’re always going to be siblings. You don’t get to uncouple that. So for better or worse, it is a forever relationship. I have a sister, and it’s a very important and fascinating relationship to me. So to get to play in that world where there’s intimacy, but there’s no flirtation, there’s no wooing, just a life lived in lockstep


And have you seen After This Death?

No! I know that it’s changed a lot from the script because Lucio told me in a very fascinating way
 When we wrapped the film, I said, “Are you excited to get into the edit?” and he said, “Yes and no. I lived with this film for 15 years. I wrote it in the order it will be edited. I shot it the same way. I think it will come together quite effortlessly.” And I saw him quite recently and he said, “Just ignore everything I said. I had to throw the entire thing into the blender and rediscover the film. It is nothing to do with the script.”

Isaac Hernández, Rupert Friend and Jessica Chastain in ‘Dreams.’

Wow. So you have no idea what to expect when your film premieres in Berlin this week?

I’m not a fan of watching myself, but as a lover of cinema and of directors who are trying to push the medium, I am fascinated to [see it]. Lucio lectures in film. He’s so generous as a mentor. He’s fascinated by the theory of it, the history of it. He wrote the thing, he shot the thing. And the idea that he’s said it’s unrecognizable from that is fascinating to me, just as a student of film. Some of the stuff he had in the script was so out there — it’s a love triangle between Mía Maestro who’s character is married to me, but she becomes obsessed with a musician who is played by Lee Pace.

So I, in a sense, play the cuckolded husband who is completely heartbroken by this whole thing. It was just the opposite of Jake: someone who’s trying to live a good life and love his wife and also be receptive to her changing hormonal state and depression and try and give her what she wants at the cost of his own happiness — and potentially sanity.

You hadn’t worked with Lee or Mía before this, right?

No, and Dreams was shot primarily in San Francisco, and then we went down to Mexico for a little bit. And After This Death was primarily upstate New York, then we went to Puerto Rico for this fantastical sequence involving a fisherman and a flirtation with Mía’s character. And that was a very dreamy thing. Have you ever heard of the bioluminescence phenomena?

I don’t think I have.

It’s a sort of plankton which in the water, if the conditions are just right, you move your hand through the sea and it glows phosphorescent. Mía and I, one night after shooting, found the secret beach, and it was the right conditions. In my head, that’s in the film, but it’s not. It’s just one of those memories. I also remember I was by myself, my wife couldn’t come, and I went off by myself one time and found the most secret beach I think I’ve ever seen. No footprints, no signs of mankind, no civilization, no tarmac. I remember having a very incredible skinny dip there. Sorry — this is completely nothing to do with the film.

In some ways, it is, though. It’s your experience while shooting and is no doubt going to influence your grasp of the story and your character. You have to immerse yourself, right?

That’s very true. And coming full circle to the beginning of the conversation, ChĂ©ri is based on a book of the same name by Colette, and it is a cold, hard book about some pretty cold people. And I think that all went into the film. None of the people who made the film are like that, but the source material is intrinsically about the fact that you cannot stop time. We are all going to get older and die. That is at the heart of the book. After This Death is in my feeling of it, that bioluminescent water. It has a dreamy quality, an unreal quality where we’re not quite sure if we’re watching what’s actually happening.

And the nature of the threesome is that it tends to be Mía and me or Mía and Lee — not the three of us together that much. So I don’t know what those two did for their side of the film. It’ll be fascinating.

You’re an audience member as much as the rest of us.

Yeah, which could be triggering [after the 2009 Berlin Film Festival] but you gotta get over yourself.

I really hope it isn’t triggering for you.

[Laughs.] Thank you. I also think there’s something that comes with age and having had — I mean, any actor will tell you the rejections number is in the thousands. We all have to get used to it, even if you’re top of the tree. The idea of being passed over or failing or rejection — they are part of of life.

Reviews

0 %

User Score

0 ratings
Rate This

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *